There is a lot of talk in the news at the moment about ‘refugees’ and whether we should ‘take them’ or not, or intriguingly, whether perhaps we should only ‘take’ ‘Christian’ refugees…
But you can’t brand people.
People are people.
They are not a culture.
They are not a religion.
They are not a headscarf or fashion sense.
They are not a race.
They are not a country.
They are not a language.
They are not a ‘refugee’. They are a person.
We are all human beings.
We are all people, and the notion of putting boundaries, barriers and borders between us all is somewhat ludicrous. For starters, people do not actually own the land or Earth. Earth was not created with crazy outlines of borders between ‘states’ and ‘countries’ to be fought over. Earth itself is unified.
On the inside, we are all made of the same stuff. We have the same organs. We have the same hearts. We all love, care and are deeply sensitive. We have families, we care for people. We bleed when we are cut, we get hurt by cruelty and trauma. We get the same illnesses and diseases.
We are a one humanity, and artificial borders, different creeds or beliefs, or dress codes, skin colour or language do not in truth make us different. Our very DNA says that we are all the same. There is no gene for ‘refugee’, ‘migrant’, ‘Australian’, ‘Muslim’, ‘Jew’ or ‘Christian’.
There is an argument that in Australia and many countries in ‘the West’ that we should not take ‘refugees’ because we do not know whether we will be taking terrorists.
Should we also put a ban on babies being born in our countries because we can’t guarantee whether potential criminals or terrorists will be being brought into our country via birth?
What we are facing in the world at the moment is a mass exodus of biblical proportions from a war torn country, Syria. Millions of people are leaving the country because life is untenable there. Are we truly going to stand aside in our comfortable lives in the West and turn our backs on human suffering because we ourselves are comfortable?
Substitute the word refugee for the word ‘person’ or human being’. Would we feel similarly?
Change the dress code and skin colour – would we feel differently?
What if it were us?
What if our comfortable urban lives were turned upside down by economic crisis and perhaps a change of government, and a militia group took over and started destroying people and the country, beheading people in our public squares? What if we were forced to leave because life became untenable here? How would we feel about being placed in inhospitable concentration, sorry I mean detention camps? How would we feel about being ‘processed’ for 5 years whilst women were being raped, and we were being held in unsanitary overcrowded conditions, unable to work, with limited access to computers, where even sanitary pads were not made available to women? Would we not out cry to the world to take care of us?
We are all the same.
We are a one humanity and the ‘refugee’ crisis at the moment is not a ‘refugee’ crisis, it is a crisis facing the world affecting millions of ‘people’.
We have a responsibility to each other to not keep each other out.
We have a responsibility to care for one another.
This matter is not a matter for Australia, nor for Germany, or only a few countries, but rather this is a global matter and we need to approach it globally.
People are in crisis and people are in such trouble that they are getting on overcrowded leaky dinghies to cross oceans. Not a stream or a canal, but oceans with large waves and high winds. It doesn’t get worse than that.
It is a call for us all to take care of and heed the pain of our brothers.
Let people in. They have no home.
If life is untenable where they are we have a responsibility to let them in and take care of them. Welcome them as equals. Not tolerate them, but welcome them with open arms and no discrimination or hostility.
Had we had no hospitality after the Second World War, where would many of us be today?
I myself am the daughter of a person, a former ‘refugee’ from war torn Eastern Europe in the late 1940s.
Had Australian not been open in the 1940s and 1950s, where would Australia be today, and what would have happened to those millions of people displaced by the cruelty of the Second World War? I am certain that a few war criminals made it through the post war refugee hospitality, but have our countries truly suffered for that? And have they not benefited from the input of the hundreds of thousands that migrated there.
We were open once, why not be open again? Or do we have selective humanitarian policies considering only those with a particular skin colour or religious creed to be ‘human’ enough to have rights…?
We cannot consider ‘refugees’ to be other than us, but rather to consider them as people, just like us.
We are a vast country in Australia with vast space to house millions more people.
Sure, perhaps a few undesirable elements may make it through, but do we punish hundreds of thousands or millions and allow them to suffer and die because of that? Or do we rather be prepared to deal with the minor harm that comes when people come? Or are we so narrow sighted as to assume that every single person who is coming is a criminal…really? millions of people leaving their country are all criminals and terrorists…that doesn’t make sense.
In Australia, we have a tradition that migrants are very hard working. Our country has been enriched by the millions of people who have come here, many of them former refugees. It appears to me to be an urban myth that migrants/refugees/people-not-born-in-this-country are lazy drains on our social welfare system.
Lets open our hearts with the governments of the rest of the world, and work together to take care of people who are so traumatised they are leaving their home country in their millions. It may even be good for our economy.
The end. Dr Maxine Szramka